KAJIAN YURIDIS PEMASARAN RUMAH TAPAK YANG SEDANG DIBANGUN OLEH PENGEMBANG BERDASARKAN PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI

Subekti Subekti; Dudik  Djaja Sidarta; Sri  Astutik; Suyanto Suyanto; Nur  Handayati; Mokh. Tho’if Tho’if

Authors

Subekti Subekti Universitas Dr. Soetomo
Dudik Djaja Sidarta Fakultas Hukum Universitas Dr. Soetomo
Sri Astutik Fakultas Hukum Universitas Dr. Soetomo
Suyanto Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Gresik
Nur Handayati Fakultas Hukum Universitas Dr. Soetomo
Mokh. Tho’if Fakultas Hukum Sunan Bonang Tuban

Keywords:

Legal certainty, binding sale and purchase agreement, developer, buyer, landed house

Abstract

Abstract: The marketing of landed houses that are not yet physically visible even before the foundation pillars are formed is carried out using the Binding Sale and Purchase Agreement mechanism, which often violates consumer rights in Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection because of the clauses in the Binding Agreement Buying and selling is more profitable for developers. This research examines whether the marketing system for landed houses being built by developers based on sales and purchase agreements can provide legal certainty for buyers. This research was conducted using normative research methods which focus on statutory regulations related to guaranteeing legal certainty in the marketing of landed houses as well as literature reviews related to the problems studied. The results of the research show that the mechanism for buying and selling landed houses being built by developers based on a sale and purchase agreement does not provide a guarantee of legal certainty for consumers when there is no monitoring of housing development of at least 20% and there is no monitoring that the Housing Development Acceleration Agency has provided a guarantee of development of housing. Landed house. The legal position of buyers of landed houses after handover is unclear because the sale and purchase deed does not yet exist. Landed house buyers only have a binding sale and purchase agreement which cannot be used as a basis for issuing a certificate.

References

BUKU

Budi Harsono. Hukum Agraria Indonesia (Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Isi Dan Pelaksanaannya). Jakarta: Djambatan, 1997.

Mariam Darus Badrulzaman. Kompilasi Hukum Perikatan. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2001.

Marzuki P.M. Penelitian Hukum. Kencana, 2009.

Robensjah Sjachran. “Karakteristik Perjanjian Jual Beli Properti Dengan Sistem Pre Project Selling.” Universitas Airlangga, 2016.

Subekti. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Rumah Tapak Dalam Jual Beli Berdasarkan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Belin. 1st ed. Surabaya: Jakad Media Publishing, 2020.

Yahya Harahap. Segi-Segi Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung: Alumni, 1986.

-----, Segi-Segi Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung: Alumni, 1986.

Yusuf Sofie. Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Dan Instrumen-Instrumen Hukumnya. Ban-dung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2008.

JURNAL

Erliasna Br. Tarigan. “Analisis Yuridis Tangging Jawab Para Pihak Dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah Dengan Angsuran Yang Dibuat Di Bawah Tangan.” Premise Law Journal 2, no. 2 (2016): 6–6.

Lia Julianti Surbakti. “Analisis Hukum Penambahan Apartemen Dalam Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Yang Mengakibatkan Peningkatan Nilai Cicilan (Studi Kasus Perkara No. 190/Pdt./2018/Pdt.Bdg).” Jurnal Notarius 2, no. 1 (2023): 179–179.

-----, “Analisis Hukum Penambahan Apartemen Dalam Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Yang Mengakibatkan Peningkatan Nilai Cicilan (Studi Kasus Perkara No. 190/Pdt./2018/Pdt.Bdg).” Jurnal Notarius 2, no. 1 (2023): 179–179.

OlivHien Huqmi Adhelia. “Perjanjian Baku Menurut Perspektif Pengusaha, Konsumen Dan Kepastian Hukum Dalam Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen.” Unes Law Jurnal 5, no. 4 (June 2023): 3257–3257.

Yuanita Puspitasari. “Penyimpangan Klausula Baku Yang Terdapat Dalam Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Rumah.” Notaire 3, no. 2 (June 2020).